Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Fuzzy Nautilus Rediscovered and Filmed After 30 Years


Fuzzy Nautilus Rediscovered and Filmed After 30 Years

 A detailed shot reveals the fuzzy texturing of Allonautilus scrobiculatus as well as the visible spiral in its shell, and the pinhole eye and thin flexible tentacles emerging from the harder tentacle sheaths shared by other nautiloids as well. (Photo by Peter Ward)

















  Lou Marconi By Peter Ward, National Geographic/Waitt grantee

 t’s really nice to see an old friend after a long absence.

Thirty years after the discovery of the fuzzy, slimy, Allonautilus scrobiculatus, I returned to Papua New Guinea to see if this remarkable living fossil had survived the decades of shell hunting and environmental degradation that have driven these living fossils and their closest relatives to the brink of extinction.

We not only found them, we captured the first digital images of them alive in the wild, and attached tracking devices that are revealing some of the oldest and deepest secrets of their survival.

A Name Like No Other

“Nautilus.” The name conjures images of Jules Verne and the United States Navy with its first atomic submarine, and hidden between them, the name-giving animal itself.

Among biologists it is this animal that inspires most, for the simple reason that it appears to be one of the great survivors on Planet Earth: a living fossil.


 Coming from stock that first appeared near the end of the 530-million-year-old Cambrian Explosion, when animal life first appeared in our planet’s global ocean, the nautiloid cephalopods have endured through both good times and bad, including times very, very bad indeed: the great mass extinctions, short intervals of time when most species on Earth died out. Thus survivors such as the nautilus are revered by science.

Unfortunately, it is the very popularity of their beautiful, iconic, spiraled, and internally chambered shells that threatens them most, more than meteors from space, atmosphere-polluting global volcanoes, or even long-enduring ice ages ever did. Surviving mass extinction events is one thing. Surviving the global spread and increasing numbers of humans and our desire for shells and cheap trinkets made from those shells is something else entirely.

Now nautiluses must face another challenge: humans’ desire for metals found most abundantly on the sea beds these ancient survivors call home. And despite all these threats, and the nautiloids’ long history, fascinating discoveries are still being made about them.
















 A chambered nautilus’s shell reveals its bright red colors when viewed in shallow water from above. (Photo by Peter Ward)

 The Other Nautilus

At most sites around the Earth, nautiluses can be found at depths between 300 and a thousand feet. They live singly (never in schools), they grow slowly (taking up to 15 years to reach full size and reproductive age), and they are n
ever overly abundant as they slowly swim over the deep sea beds searching for carrion on the bottom.

In all but one place on Earth, only a single nautilus species can be found at any one site.

Northeast of the main island of Papua New Guinea however, along the coast of Manus Island, made famous by the American anthropologist Margaret Mead in the earlier part of the twentieth century, not only can you find the well-known chambered nautilus (genus: Nautilus, species: pompilius) but south of Manus there is a second species as well. It was first seen alive in 1984, and was found to be so astoundingly different in shell and soft part anatomy that it was, in 1997, give a wholly new genus name: Allonautilus (and species name scrobiculatus). And then, for the next 30 years, it wasn’t seen again.

















  Gregory Barord releases two Allonautilus scrobiculatus with ultrasonic transmitters attached to the dorsal sides of their shells. (Photo by Peter Ward)


  • Recently, National Geographic and the US National Science Foundation (Polar Programs) sponsored an expedition back to the site where Allonautilus was last seen, and the team succeeded in finding it anew.

    The Mission: Snap Pictures, Snip Samples, Leave
    ‘Em Alive

    The goals of this trip were to most broadly ascertain if they still existed at all. I was the organizer of the trip, but could not have gone forward without Greg Barord, whose recent PhD on nautilus biology is changing our understanding of this animal; Rick Hamilton of The Nature Conservancy, who spends much of his life doing conservation science in Melanesia; and Manuai Matuwae, local chief of conservation for the Manus Island area, and the real mover and shaker of our field work.
  • My prior field work in the Philippine Islands, done with Greg on four trips from 2011 to early 2014, has already shown that local populations of Nautilus in the Philippines have been fished to extinction, and the fear was that perhaps the same happened to Allonautilus in PNG in the thirty years since it was last seen alive. But beyond that, if found, the goal was to get the first digital photos, the first live videos, and most importantly, get small snips of flesh, taken in non-lethal fashion, so that the new and powerful DNA techniques of modern genetic science could better understand these animals.

    A further goal was, almost ironically, to use bits of shell taken from living nautiloids in a very warm tropical setting, to better understand ancient nautiloids that lived right before and after the great Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction in Antarctica, a very cold setting indeed for us field workers when down there now.

    Living Fossils and Fossil-Fossils

    On four extended field trips sponsored by Polar Programs, I pondered the problem of why the fossil nautiloids so common at our Antarctic field sites survived the catastrophic mass extinction of 65 million years ago ending the Cretaceous, while their near look-alikes, the ammonites (also cephalopods with chambered shells) utterly died out. One group lives, one dies. As the great, and sadly recently deceased paleontologist David Raup famously asked, “Was it good genes? Or simply good luck?”

    The question was made partially tractable by our Antarctic field work, and it was the generosity of National Geographic and the Waitt Foundation as well as NSF Polar Programs that allowed this current trip to be possible, the leadership scientists there understanding that the present is indeed the key to the past; that we also needed to study the living descendants as well as the Cretaceous dead, which took us to this study of extant Nautilus and its cousin, Allonautilus, at the sole known place where both can be found.














Swimming with nautiluses in the wild is a great joy. (Photo by Andy Dunstan)

 Sending Their Secrets Up From the Deep

Additionally, two other techniques not available in 1985 were brought to the field site: deep water video cameras and small acoustic transmitters that could be attached to the shell. If monitored overhead day and night from small boats fitted with appropriate electronic receivers, these transmitters would obtain priceless information on the habits, depths, and even temperatures at which Nautilus and Allonautilus live on the same shared, deep reef environments.

Which led to our day-to-day life. We worked around the clock, with Rick, Manuai, and Greg taking turns with me as we sat in small boats day and night to retrieve the signals of our tagged nautiluses, living their lives far below but informing us of their depths, position, and temperatures of habitation for six days and five nights straight. The heat was a force—oppressive, the afternoons barely breathable; and it is in such times that companions can make the hardship bearable—others living the same hardships and not complaining.

The great joys were the moments we retrieved our traps to find nautiluses, the times we would swim with them, and especially when we pulled our giant, heavy deep-water video systems from the sea and spread out on the lawn on our small island. We’d bring our entire, 40-person clan together and watch the premiere of each 12-hour movie of the night before (played back faster than normal) to watch the nautiluses, deep-water sharks and other fish, and invertebrates of every stripe march into the camera’s field of view in search of the rich fish bait attached to its bright light.



















 Nautilus pompilius (left) and Allonautilus scrobiculatus (right) floating together, like nowhere else on Earth. (Photo by Peter Ward)

 
Happily (and in spite of the rigors of working from small boats in equatorial heat and humidity, the latter playing h
avoc with all electronics, computers, and cameras), all goals were met. None of the nautiluses we saw or briefly collected were “sacrificed for science” (i.e., killed and put in alcohol for eventual existence on a museum shelf).

The data and photos tell us that both of these nautiloid cephalopods exist still. The possible bad news is that their habitat—this part of Papua New Guinea where uniquely in the world two genera of nautiloid cephalopods live—is slated soon for large-scale, deep-water mining that will dredge the sea floor, a seafloor above which these ancient survivors still live.

But for how much longer?


































A very insightful essay bringing to the surface the very very delicate balance that exists on our planet between flora & fauna.  The Earth  must maintain this balance so that the  Earth's very poignant beauty and purpose and function~~~~is SUSTAINED.

Its impact on the economy, pollution, and the focus on Climate; The Conversation---makes this worthy substance, for continued enthusiasm, and consideration


Lou Marconi (SuiteLou0819)


HICKOK

Friday, July 24, 2015

Penguins have only two types of taste genes; no wonder they gulp their food.

 

Penguins have only two types of taste genes; no wonder they gulp their food

 Penguins, infamous food gulpers, may be unable to taste many thingsPenguins may look tastefully attired, but they lack the genes for two types of taste that other birds have, according to a new study. (Lee Hotz / Los Angeles Times)














DEBATE: Are Restrictions on Fracking and Oil Exports Stifling American Prosperity?

Science Scientists Make Novel Attempt to Save Giant Turtle Species

 

Science

Scientists Make Novel Attempt to Save Giant Turtle Species

The Yangtze giant softshell turtle has been driven to the brink of extinction. Credit Gerald Kuchling/Turtle Survival Alliance

In May, an international team of scientists, veterinarians and zookeepers gathered at the Suzhou Zoo near Shanghai. Their desperate mission: to attempt the first artificial insemination ever of a softshell turtle, saving the species from oblivion.
“Even if we get just one or two hatchlings, I will be very happy,” said Gerald Kuchling, a project leader for the Turtle Survival Alliance, a nonprofit conservation organization. “Even a single one would give hope for the recovery of this magnificent animal. It would be a turn.”
Quite a turn, actually. The Yangtze giant softshell turtle — thought to be the largest freshwater turtle in the world — was once common in the Yangtze and Red Rivers. But by the late 1990s, pollution, hunting, dams and development had driven it to the brink of extinction.
There are only four known specimens remaining, and only one female — an 85-year-old resident of the Suzhou Zoo. For years, biologists have been trying to coax her and her 100-year-old mate to produce hatchlings. So far the pair have disappointed scientists, with the female laying clutch after clutch of unfertilized eggs.
She was discovered only in 2007, three years after the sole other known female died at the Beijing Zoo. Desperate to find another, Dr. Kuchling and Lu Shunqing, a turtle specialist from the Wildlife Conservation Society’s China branch, had asked every zoo in the country to send them photographs of any large softshell turtles in their possession.
One image, taken at the Changsha Zoo in Hunan, caught their eye, and days later, they arrived to examine the turtle. It was indeed a Yangtze giant softshell turtle and, crucially, a female. She had once been part of a traveling animal exhibition, they learned, and became a permanent resident of the zoo shortly after the end of the Chinese Revolution in 1949.
Dr. Kuchling and Dr. Lu arranged for her transport to the Suzhou Zoo, where they hoped she and the zoo’s male specimen would begin producing more of their kind. To their delight, the animals did appear to mate, and that summer, the female laid around 180 eggs.
But none proved fertile, a disappointment that would repeat itself for six years. “The conservation world was holding its breath,” said Rick Hudson, the president of the Turtle Survival Alliance. “It’s been a lot of frustration since.”
Scientists decided to intervene. On May 6, Dr. Kuchling and Dr. Lu, with a team that included turtle experts from the United States, drained the male’s pond and used a cargo net to wrangle the 140-pound turtle onto a stack of car tires that served as a makeshift examination stand. Putting him under anesthesia, the scientists used an electrical probe to induce a partial penile erection.
Normally, the penis of the Yangtze giant softshell turtle looks a bit like a medieval weapon. Equipped with fleshy spikes, protuberances and lobes, it is designed to navigate the female’s equally complex reproductive organ, located inside a byzantine chamber called the cloaca.

The problem became immediately clear to the scientists: This turtle’s penis was mangled.
Two decades earlier, another Yangtze giant softshell turtle had been added to the male’s pond in an attempt to mate the animals. The second turtle turned out to be male, as well, and the two fought. The second male was killed, and the victor suffered serious damage to his shell and, it now appears, to his reproductive organ.
The team also examined the male’s sperm — extracted using electrical stimuli — and finally discovered good news. While motility was low, the sperm were viable. The scientists decided to proceed with artificial insemination of the female.
With no case studies to go on, the team had to improvise. Dr. Kuchling examined the sedated female’s cloaca with a fiber-optic endoscope to locate the compartment leading to her oviducts. Then Barbara Durrant, the director of reproductive physiology at the San Diego Zoo’s Institute for Conservation Research, deposited the semen.
“It was just a matter of delivering the semen through a small plastic tube into what we think is the correct place,” she said. “Unfortunately, there just hasn’t been that much basic reproductive physiology work done in turtles and tortoises.”
Even if it’s guesswork, artificial insemination may be the only chance to save the species. Two other male Yangtze giant softshell turtles are believed to be in Vietnam — one in Hoan Kiem Lake, in the center of Hanoi. But those animals “are pretty much off limits for any non-Vietnamese,” Dr. Kuchling said, and so a collaborative breeding program seems unlikely.
A handful of Yangtze giant softshell turtles may remain in the wild; tentative sightings have been reported in a dam reservoir on the Red River in Yunnan Province. Conservationists, however, are not betting that another male will be captured anytime soon.

ScienceTake | The Turtle’s Point of View

Scientists studying the behavior of endangered leatherback sea turtles put video cameras on their shells.
By James Gorman and Poh Si Teng on Publish Date February 23, 2015. Watch in Times Video »
Now the wait begins. When the female lays her first clutch of eggs, probably by late June, the scientists will know if this first effort was fruitful.
“Nobody has ever done this before, and it’s probably a long shot,” Dr. Kuchling said. “But we are all hopeful, and if it doesn’t work this time, we’ll definitely try again. Despair is not an option.”

Pertinent themes as Global Warming, Climate Change, and Melting Ice Caps has stimulated discussions, seeded forums, and spawned additional research, all to foster consensus, and recommend courses-of-action. 


The intent of CLIMATE; THE CONVERSATION, is to be The Bulletin Board, The Platform, The Podium,  and The Credible Source & Bibliography for such astute, sincere, and scholarly considerations. 

Sincerely;

Administrators:

Andrew M. Marconi

Lou Marconi